Learning From Student Experience: Development of an International Multimodal Patient Safety Education Package.

BACKGROUND: Patient safety is a global concern. Learning to provide safe, high-quality care is core to nursing education. PROBLEM: Students are exposed to diverse clinical practices, and experiences may vary between placements and across countries. Student experience is seldom used as an educational resource. APPROACH: An international, European Union-funded project, Sharing Learning from Practice for Patient Safety (SLIPPs), aimed to develop an innovative online educational package to assist patient safety learning. Based on student reported data and educational theory, multiple elements were iteratively developed by a multicountry, multidisciplinary group. OUTCOMES: The educational package is freely available on the SLIPPs Web site. Materials include a student reporting and reflection tool, virtual seminars, student reports data set, pedagogical game, high-fidelity simulation scenarios, scenario development and use guidelines, debriefing session model, and videos of simulations already performed. CONCLUSIONS: E-learning enables removal of physical barriers, allowing educators, professionals, and students from all over the world to collaborate, interact, and learn from each other.

Development of an International Tool for Students to Record and Reflect on Patient Safety Learning Experiences.

BACKGROUND: Underpinning all nursing education is the development of safe practitioners who provide quality care. Learning in practice settings is important, but student experiences vary. PURPOSE: This study aimed to systematically develop a robust multilingual, multiprofessional data collection tool, which prompts students to describe and reflect on patient safety experiences. APPROACH: Core to a 3-year, 5-country, European project was development of the SLIPPS (Sharing Learning from Practice for Patient Safety) Learning Event Recording Tool (SLERT). Tool construction drew on literature, theory, multinational and multidisciplinary experience, and involved pretesting and translation. Piloting included assessing usability and an initial exploration of impact via student interviews. OUTCOMES: The final SLERT (provided for readers) is freely available in 5 languages and has face validity for nursing across 5 countries. Student reports (n = 368) were collected using the tool. CONCLUSIONS: The tool functions well in assisting student learning and for collecting data. Interviews indicated the tool promoted individual learning and has potential for wider clinical teams.

A blended learning teaching strategy strengthens the nursing students' performance and self-reported learning outcome achievement in an anatomy, physiology and biochemistry course - A quasi-experimental study.

In nursing, bioscience is regarded as one of the cornerstones of nursing practice. However, bioscience disciplines as anatomy, physiology and biochemistry are considered challenging for students and the failure rate is high. In this study we explore a blended learning teaching strategy in an anatomy, physiology and biochemistry course for first year Bachelor nursing students. In the blended learning teaching strategy, short narrated online digital resources of bioscientific terms and concepts were integrated into the teaching design along with digital metacognitive evaluations of learning outcomes. Results show that compared to students receiving traditional face-to-face teaching, the students with a blended learning approach performed better on their national exam with a small to medium effect size (Cohen's d=0.23). Student course evaluations supported the blended learning delivery with small to medium effect sizes. The students reported that the digital resources supported their learning outcome achievement, that they better understood the teacher's expectations and that they were more satisfied with their virtual learning environment. This study adds to the growing literature of blended learning effectiveness in higher education, and suggests the use of digital resources as an enrichment of teaching and enhancement of students' study experience.

Critical Incident Techniques and Reflection in Nursing and Health Professions Education: Systematic Narrative Review.

BACKGROUND: The terms critical incident technique and reflection are widely used but often not fully explained, resulting in ambiguity. PURPOSE: The aims of this review were to map and describe existing approaches to recording or using critical incidents and reflection in nursing and health professions literature over the last decade; identify challenges, facilitating factors, strengths, and weaknesses; and discuss relevance for nursing education. METHODS: A systematic narrative review was undertaken. MEDLINE and the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature were searched using MeSH terms, returning 223 articles (2006-2017). After exclusions, 41 were reviewed. RESULTS: Articles were categorized into 3 areas: descriptions of the development of an original tool or model, critical incidents or reflection on events used as a learning tool, and personal reflections on critical incidents. CONCLUSIONS: Benefits have been identified in all areas. More attention is needed to the pedagogy of reflection and the role of educators in reflection.

Shared learning from national to international contexts: a research and innovation collaboration to enhance education for patient safety.

BACKGROUND: Patient safety is key for healthcare across the world and education is critical in improving practice. We drew on existing links to develop the Shared LearnIng from Practice to improve Patient Safety (SLIPPS) group. The group incorporates expertise in education, research, healthcare, healthcare organisation and computing from Norway, Spain, Italy, the UK and Finland. In 2016 we received co-funding from the Erasmus + programme of the European Union for a 3-year project. AIM: SLIPPS aims to develop a tool to gather learning events related to patient safety from students in each country, and to use these both for further research to understand practice, and to develop educational activities (virtual seminars, simulation scenarios and a game premise). STUDY OUTLINE: The SLIPPS project is well underway. It is underpinned by three main theoretical bodies of work: the notion of diverse knowledge contexts existing in academia, practice and at an organisational level; the theory of reflective practice; and experiential learning theory. The project is based on recognition of the unique position of students as they navigate between contexts, experience and reflect on important learning events related to patient safety. To date, we have undertaken the development of the SLIPPS Learning Event Recording Tool (SLERT) and have begun to gather event descriptions and reflections. CONCLUSIONS: Key to the ongoing success of SLIPPS are relationships and reciprocal openness to view things from diverse perspectives and cultures.

Understanding through experience: information, experience and understanding in clinical rehabilitation practice.

PURPOSE: According to ethical theories of patient autonomy, patients need information and understanding to make their own, autonomous choices. The aim of this article is to describe strategies used by clinical rehabilitation teams to develop patients' understanding and promote their autonomy. METHOD: Individual semi-structured interviews were conducted with the patient, the nurse, the physiotherapist and the physician of three institution based rehabilitation teams. Analytic procedures described by Strauss and Corbin were applied, identifying categories by their properties and dimensions. RESULTS: The analysis revealed how practitioners recognized that patients needed experience with practical challenges in order to understand their clinical conditions properly. Practitioners disclosed information related to the individual patient's experience with his or her clinical condition. In order to make information relevant to the individual patient's experience of possibilities and limitations, information was disclosed in discussions of these experiences, rather than in abstract verbal explanations. Patients needed to understand their situation to make autonomous choices for their future lives. CONCLUSIONS: In clinical rehabilitation, patients and practitioners agree that adequate understanding cannot be achieved by verbal information alone, and that patients need to experience essential aspects of their physical possibilities and limitations. IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATION: Patients need an adequate understanding of their injuries or diseases to be able to make autonomous choices. In clinical rehabilitation teams, practical and bodily experiences are recognized as crucial for patients to develop such understanding. Rehabilitation practitioners may effectively enhance a patient's understanding and autonomy by disclosing information as part of discussions of the patient's own experiences.

Interviewing patients and practitioners working together in teams. A multi-layered puzzle: putting the pieces together.

This paper presents and evaluates a methodological approach aiming at analysing some of the complex interaction between patients and different health care practitioners working together in teams. Qualitative health care research describes the values, perceptions and conceptions of patients and practitioners. In modern clinical work patients and professional practitioners often work together on complex cases involving different kinds of knowledge and values, each of them representing different perspectives. We need studies designed to capture this complexity. The methodological approach presented here is exemplified with a study in rehabilitation medicine. In this part of the health care system the clinical work is organized in multi-professional clinical teams including patients, handling complex rehabilitation processes. In the presented approach data are collected in individual in-depth interviews to have thorough descriptions of each individual perspective. The interaction in the teams is analysed by comparing different descriptions of the same situations from the involved individuals. We may then discuss how these perceptions relate to each other and how the individuals in the team interact. Two examples from an empirical study are presented and discussed, illustrating how communication, differences in evaluations and the interpretation of incidents, arguments, emotions and interpersonal relations may be discussed. It is argued that this approach may give information which can supplement the methods commonly applied in qualitative health care research today.